Judicial Conduct Act grants the chief justice of the US Supreme Court the added position of the presiding officer of the Judicial Conference of the US . This gives the chief justice the opportunity to engage in policy making that affects rights and liberties without notice or authority. American would be outraged if the media would inform them. Yet the media and the nation’s legal scholars, judicial policy organizations, and members of the federal and state bar associations keep it a secrete. The DRE is a radical, extreme example of a jurisdiction rule that is actually an illegal, unauthorized policy making that the presiding officer and members of the Judicial Conference of the US allow the federal judge to enforce against Americans.
Below are studies the openly discussed illegal policy making finding that the notion the policy making is only for “non-housekeeping category of procedural rules” to be “absurd” and “political non-sense” and that in fact policy making that is authorized the Conference produces “substantive rules” that are deliberately “implicate significant economic, social, or political disputes [that as a matter of fact, reason and law] require Congressional and presidential approval.”