The Institute of Judicial Conduct (“IJC”) is the nation’s only independent authority on the workings, the operations, of the “Judicial Councils Reform and Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980” (Act) (1). The Act created a system of 13 Judicial Councils and 1 Judicial Conference that is effectively a national citizens’ review board to govern the conduct of the federal judges. The Act empowers any person to confront a federal judge or group of federal judges with a complaint about their conduct. The Act created a simple system outside of the US Courts to protect Americans from the federal court rules and procedures that judges and lawyers can use to fabricate ineffective, time confusing, and costly litigation that can yield preposterous outcomes.

IJC discovered that the chief justice of the US Supreme Court and the US Attorneys General have secretly and lawlessly usurped the Act unto to themselves. In secret these two US officials are using the Act for the exact opposite purpose. The Act is being secretly used to lawlessly fabricate policies and to organize fraudulent federal judicial conduct in US Courts in order to impose these lawlessly fabricated polices on Americans. IJC discovered this during its investigation of the use of one such fabricated judicial policy to coerce Americans.

The policy that led the IJC to make its discovery is what the federal judges call the “domestic relations [and domestic violence] exception [DRE] to federal subject matter jurisdiction.”  We coined the “DRE” abbreviation to refer to this lawlessly fabricated judicial doctrine. The federal judges defend the DRE in US Courts by falsely claiming that the DRE is “a legitimate judicial doctrine of deference to federalism in family law.”

President John F. Kennedy famously said that “[t]he very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society; we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.”[1] The DRE only exist through the secret proceedings of a secret society consisting of the US Attorneys General, the presiding officer of the Judicial Conference who is the chief justice, and certain members of Congress who contest to their agreements and conduct.

The DRE is powerful and inexorable evidence of the nationwide enforcement of an lawlessly fabricated policy. America’s Constitution and the democratic constitutional republic created under the Constitution can only survive by terminating and forever eliminating the opportunity for the federal judges and the US Attorneys General to enforce lawlessly fabricated policies.

(1) Public Law 96–458 (S 1873),October 15, 1980, 94 Stat 2035, 18 USC. The “Judicial Council Reform and Judicial Conduct and Disability Act” of 1980 (US Code, Title 28 Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Part I: Organization of Courts, Chapter 16, titled “Complaints against Judges and Judicial Discipline” [§§ 351–364]). The “Conferences and Councils of Judges Law” and the “21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act” enacted under Pub. L. 107-273 and incorporates the “Judicial Improvements Act of 2002,” which enacts USC Title 28 Chapter 16 and amends §§ 331, 332, 372, 375, and 604. For the legislative history, see H.R. Rep. 107-459 (2002).